Punishment doesn’t fit the crime in a crowd-pleasing comedy drama directed by the late Roger Michell, based on the outlandish true story of a daring art theft that made national headlines in March 1961.
Nimbly scripted by Richard Bean and Clive Colman, The Duke is comfortingly old-fashioned and cosy fare, gifting Jim Broadbent a plum role as a twinkly-eyed, self-educated campaigner for social justice who steals a work of art to make a point that £140,000 of public money should not have been spent to keep it in the country. who would rather spend two weeks behind bars than pay for a TV licence that he believes should be free for OAPs.
The Oscar-winning actor pickpockets a convincing Newcastle accent – more so than some co-stars – and plies bountiful charm as an irascible everyman, who stands up for what he believes in, regardless of the potential embarrassment to his despairing wife, played by Dame Helen Mirren.
They catalyse delightful screen chemistry, bickering about his reckless disregard for social niceties before he melts her frustration into laughter with an impromptu waltz around the front room.
Supporting characters are short-changed by Bean and Colman’s broad brushstrokes and the script’s portrait of life beneath the smoking chimney stacks of 1961 Newcastle-upon-Tyne is entirely predictable.
However, it’s hard to resist a good-humoured tonic for the soul that slips down as smoothly as a bottle of brown ale.
Sixty-year-old aspiring BBC scriptwriter Kempton Bunton (Broadbent) lives with his long-suffering housekeeper wife Dorothy (Mirren).
Recently released from prison for refusing to pay for a TV licence, Kempton struggles to hold down a job at a local bakery, while Dorothy diligently tends to the needs of her sympathetic employer, Mrs Gowling (Anna Maxwell Martin).
Watching the TV that secured him a 13-day spell behind bars, Kempton is enraged by a news report about the National Gallery in London using £140,000 of taxpayers’ money to keep Francisco Goya’s portrait of Arthur Wellesley, the Duke of Wellington, in the country.
He fervently believes the money should have been spent on war widows and pensioners rather than a “half-baked portrait by some Spanish drunk”.
Soon after, Kempton travels to London with his latest submission for the BBC.
That night, the portrait vanishes from the National Gallery and police boldly proclaim the heist to be the work of “a highly professional, criminal gang”.
Little do they know that the prized canvas is concealed in a wardrobe in Kempton’s terraced home.
The Duke stands accused of crimes against originality but Michell’s feelgood picture confidently sets out the case for leniency to the same roars of approval from the gallery that greet Kempton’s straight-talking defence of his actions.
The script becomes overly sentimental for its closing argument but our sympathy and affection are wholeheartedly with Broadbent’s working-class warrior by this point.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here